Afghanistan - Kabul

Germany - Berlin (Berlin)

Guyana - Georgetown

Morocco - Rabat

Pakistan - Islamabad

Trinidad - Port of Spain

U.K - London (England)

U.S.A - Washington DC (District of Columbia)

Saudi Arabia - Makkah

Saudi Arabia - Medina

Friday, August 30, 2019

Media Release: Rogue Head of The Prison's High-Risk Management Unit.

Media Release:

Re; Rogue Head of The Prison's High-Risk Management Unit.

Waajihatul Islaamiyyah (The Islamic Front) is calling on Prisons Commissioner Gerard Wilson to answer why to date; 5 Muslim inmates; in particular Roget Boucher and Sheldon Reid (an elderly Diabetic person) and others which includes Michael Finley, Olatunji Denbow and Brent Johnson, is still being housed at Building 13; the "Muslim Dungeon" located at the Maximum Security Prison.

Further, Waajihatul Islaamiyyah (The Islamic Front) is demanding answers into the false accusations purported throughout the prison, that both men Boucher and Reid had some involvement into criminal acts at the prison; an accusation, they know nothing about. Additionally, Waajihatul Islaamiyyah (The Islamic Front) understands that this was the handy work of chief advisor to the Prisons Commissioner, Wilson, who also happens to head of the High-risk management unit. This advisor is also responsible for banning Arabic books coming into the prison.

Waajihatul Islaamiyyah (The Islamic Front) understands that this same trusted advisor has been demanding dates with female visitors and is behind the unfounded allegations pertaining to this case. We understand, that this High-Risk Management Head, mere months ago, got into a verbal spat with Roget Boucher and has since made attempts to undermine the reform and rehabilitation of Boucher.

Waajihatul Islaamiyyah (The Islamic Front) is asking, can the prisons commissioner state, whether this information is true, and answer why is his chief advisor at the center of this controversy? And thus by default placing himself; Gereld Wilson in a very compromising position. These lies and Innuendos on the part of this rogue officer who has disguised himself as a trusted advisor has tarnished and is destroying the relationship between the Prisons Service and Muslim groups in this country. Why is the Prisons Commissioner allowing himself to be manipulated like this? Again, Waajihatul Islaamiyyah (The Islamic Front) is calling on all Independent media personnel to investigate this 'so called' advisor to Commissioner Wilson, his background and his sexually predatory nature.

For Immediate Release:
Date: August., 30th 2019

Umar Abdullah
Head of Waajihatul Islaamiyyah (The Islamic Front)
Tel: +18687870765/+18683656253

Media Release: Rogue Head of The Prison's High-Risk Management Unit.

Media Release:

Re; Rogue Head of The Prison's High-Risk Management Unit.

Waajihatul Islaamiyyah (The Islamic Front) is calling on Prisons Commissioner Gerard Wilson to answer why to date; 5 Muslim inmates; in particular Roget Boucher and Sheldon Reid (an elderly Diabetic person) and others which includes Michael Finley, Olatunji Denbow and Brent Johnson, is still being housed at Building 13; the "Muslim Dungeon" located at the Maximum Security Prison.

Further, Waajihatul Islaamiyyah (The Islamic Front) is demanding answers into the false accusations purported throughout the prison, that both men Boucher and Reid had some involvement into criminal acts at the prison; an accusation, they know nothing about. Additionally, Waajihatul Islaamiyyah (The Islamic Front) understands that this was the handy work of chief advisor to the Prisons Commissioner, Wilson, who also happens to head of the High-risk management unit. This advisor is also responsible for banning Arabic books coming into the prison.

Waajihatul Islaamiyyah (The Islamic Front) understands that this same trusted advisor has been demanding dates with female visitors and is behind the unfounded allegations pertaining to this case. We understand, that this High-Risk Management Head, mere months ago, got into a verbal spat with Roget Boucher and has since made attempts to undermine the reform and rehabilitation of Boucher.

Waajihatul Islaamiyyah (The Islamic Front) is asking, can the prisons commissioner state, whether this information is true, and answer why is his chief advisor at the center of this controversy? And thus by default placing himself; Gereld Wilson in a very compromising position. These lies and Innuendos on the part of this rogue officer who has disguised himself as a trusted advisor has tarnished and is destroying the relationship between the Prisons Service and Muslim groups in this country. Why is the Prisons Commissioner allowing himself to be manipulated like this? Again, Waajihatul Islaamiyyah (The Islamic Front) is calling on all Independent media personnel to investigate this 'so called' advisor to Commissioner Wilson, his background and his sexually predatory nature.

For Immediate Release:
Date: August., 30th 2019

Umar Abdullah
Head of Waajihatul Islaamiyyah (The Islamic Front)
Tel: +18687870765/+18683656253

#UmarAbdullah #WaajihatulIslaamiyyah #TheIslamicFront #TrinidadAndTobago #MuslimInmates
#MuslimDungeon #ArabicBooks #UnfoundedAllegations #liesAndInnuendos #RogueOfficer #PrisonCommissionerGereldWilson

Tuesday, August 27, 2019

Media Release: Questions as to Why Government is Condoning Outrageous Acts Against Prisoners.

Media Release:

Re: Questions as to Why Government is Condoning Outrageous Acts Against Prisoners.

Waajihatul Islaamiyyah (The Islamic Front) is again re-iterating it’s call to the Citizenry to distance themselves from the PNM and turn support away on the ground from the PNM as campaigning is ongoing for Local Government elections. This; on the premise that this present administration continues to turn a blind eye and condone the actions of Commissioner of Prisons; Gerald Wilson, under his "NEW BOSS" Gary Griffith, in carrying out outrageous acts against prisoners and sitting on it as if nothing has ever happened.

Waajihatul Islaamiyyah (The Islamic Front) is calling on the commissioner to answer why Arabic books are not accepted in the prison and why the two (2) Muslim inmates Roget Boucher and Sheldon Reid are continuing to be housed at the dungeon, that is Building 13 or should it be referred to as the "Muslim Dungeon"? Because this building is the preferred choice by the state and by extension the commissioner and his associates when they feel to maliciously punish Muslims.  Michael Finley, Olatunji Denbow, Darryl Bissoon, Brent Johnson and Stephon Whitehall are the other inmates who are being maliciously punished. All are Muslims with the exception of Darryl Bissoon and Stephon Whitehall.

Waajihatul Islaamiyyah (The Islamic Front) is questioning whether or not fair play was involved in the selection process or was it a clear case of nepotism on the part of the prison commissioner in hiring the head the High-risk management unit. A question to the commissioner and to all investigative journalists in this country; who is this person who heads this unit? What is his track record? Where any charges brought against him?

Further, Waajihatul Islaamiyyah (The Islamic Front) is calling on the National Security Minister and by extension the Prime Minister to investigate whether the Prison commissioner has become "politically exposed" based on the relationship he shares with a certain ex high ranking international official. If this is, in fact, true, it puts him at risk for potential involvement in bribery and corruption by virtue of his position and the influence that he holds.

In light of all this Waajihatul Islaamiyyah (The Islamic Front) is calling on all investigative journalists in this country to dig deeper into the real operations of prison Commissioner Gerald Wilson and his associates. Whether or not they are creating monsters and boogiemen, further contributing to violent crimes or putting a dent into our crime splurge.

For Immediate Release:
Date: August., 27th 2019

Umar Abdullah
Head of Waajihatul Islaamiyyah (The Islamic Front)
Tel: +18687870765/+18683656253

Friday, August 2, 2019

The day of ‘Arafah

Praise be to Allaah.

The day of ‘Arafah and the fast thereon is the ninth day of the month of Dhu’l-Hijjah, which is defined for each country according to their sighting of the new moon of Dhu’l-Hijjah. So it may be on Thursday for the people of Makkah, and for others it may be on Wednesday or Saturday. It is not essential to follow the people of Makkah when there are differences in the sighting of the new moon. This is the most correct of the scholarly views, that each country has its own sighting when there is a difference concerning that. 

If the Muslims in Britain have sighted the new moon, then the Muslims in that country should follow their sighting, otherwise they should follow the sighting of the country closest to them. See the topic after this entitled "Moon Sightings at it relates to The Day of 'Arafat".

Secondly: 

There is a great deal of virtue in offering supplication (du‘aa’) on the day of ‘Arafah, because of the hadeeth of ‘Abd-Allah ibn ‘Amr ibn al-‘Aas (may Allah be pleased with him), according to which the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said: “The best of supplication is supplication of the day of Arafat, and the best of what I and the Prophets before me said is: Laa ilaaha illa Allah wahdahu, laa shareeka lah, lahu’l-mulk wa lahu’l-hamd wa huwa ‘ala kulli shay’in qadeer (There is no god but Allah alone, with no partner or associate; His is the Dominion, to Him be praise, and He has power over all things).”

Narrated by al-Tirmidhi (3585) and classed as hasan by al-Albaani in Saheeh al-Targheeb, 1536. 

Does this virtue apply only to those who are in ‘Arafat, or does it include other places too? 

Concerning that there is a difference of opinion among the scholars, which is discussed in the topic at the end, entitled "Du’aa’ offered on the day of ‘Arafah".

According to the opinion that it includes other countries and places too, the same may be said concerning it as is said above. So each person should offer supplication on the ninth day of Dhu’l-Hijjah, according to the sighting of the new moon in his country, even if the pilgrims stood in ‘Arafat on the previous day or will do so on the following day. 

And Allah knows best.

Moon Sightings at it relates to The Day of 'Arafat.

Praise be to Allaah.

Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymeen (may Allaah have mercy on him) was asked: what if the day of ‘Arafah is different because of the moon being sighted at different times in different countries? Should we fast according to the moon sighting in the country where we are or according to the moon sighting in al-Haramayn (the two Holy Sanctuaries)? 

He replied: This is based on a difference of opinion among the scholars: Is there only one moon sighting for the whole world or does it vary according to when the moon rises in different places? 

The correct view is that it varies according to when the moon rises in different places. For example, if the moon is sighted in Makkah, and today is the ninth, and it is sighted elsewhere one day before Makkah, and the day of ‘Arafah in Makkah is the tenth for them, it is not permissible for them to fast on this day because it is Eid. Similarly if it so happens that they sight the moon after Makkah, and the 9th in Makkah is the 8th for them, then they should fast the day that is the 9th for them, which is the 10th in Makkah. This is the correct view, because the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “When you see it (the new moon) fast and when you see it break your fast.” Those who did not see the moon in their own location have not seen it. Just as people are unanimously agreed that the times for dawn and sunset vary according to their own location, so too the months are also worked out by location, just like the daily timings. 

Majmoo’ al-Fataawa, 20. 

And he (may Allaah have mercy on him) was asked about some people who worked in the Saudi embassy in a foreign country, who said that they were having a problem concerning the fast of Ramadaan and the fast on the day of ‘Arafah. The brothers there had split into three groups: 

One group said: we will fast with Saudi and break the fast with Saudi. 

Another group said: we will fast with the country where we are living and break the fast with them. 

The last group said: we will fast Ramadaan with the country where we are living, but we will fast the day of ‘Arafah with Saudi. 

They asked the Shaykh to provide them with a detailed answer concerning the Ramadaan fast and fasting the day of ‘Arafah, whilst noting that for the past five years, in the country where they were living neither Ramadaan nor the day of ‘Arafah had been observed on the same days as in Saudi; their Ramadaan started one or two days after it had been announced in Saudi, and sometimes three days after. 

He replied: 

In the name of Allaah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful 

The scholars (may Allaah have mercy on them) differed concerning the issue when the moon is sighted in one part of the Muslim world and not in another: do all the Muslims have to act on the basis of that, or only those who sighted it and the people who live in the same region, or only those who sighted it and the people who live under the same government? There are many different points of view. 

The most correct view is that the matter should be referred to those who have knowledge of it. If the moon rises at the same point for two countries they become like one country, so if it is sighted in one of them that ruling applies to the other. But if the rising points differ, then each country has its own ruling. This is the view favoured by Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah (may Allaah have mercy on him); this is the apparent meaning of the texts of the Qur’aan and Sunnah and what is implied by analogy.  

In the Qur’aan it says (interpretation of the meaning): 

“So whoever of you sights (the crescent on the first night of) the month (of Ramadan i.e. is present at his home), he must observe Sawm (fasts) that month, and whoever is ill or on a journey, the same number [of days which one did not observe Sawm (fasts) must be made up] from other days. Allaah intends for you ease, and He does not want to make things difficult for you. (He wants that you) must complete the same number (of days), and that you must magnify Allaah [i.e. to say Takbeer (Allaahu Akbar: Allaah is the Most Great)] for having guided you so that you may be grateful to Him”

[al-Baqarah 2:185]

What is implied by this verse is that whoever does not see it is not obliged to fast. 

In the Sunnah, the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “When you see it (the new moon) then fast, and when you see it, break your fast.” What is implied by this hadeeth is that if we did not see it we are not obliged to fast or to break the fast. 

With regard to analogy, the times for starting and ending the fast each day should be worked out in each country on its own, according to the local times of sunrise and sunset. This is a point on which there is scholarly consensus. So you see the people in east Asia starting their fast before the people of west Asia, and breaking their fast before them, because dawn breaks for the former before the latter, and the sun sets for the former before the latter. 

Once this is established with regard to the times for starting and ending the daily fast, it also applies to the start and end of the monthly fast. There is no difference between them. 

But if many regions come under the same government, and the ruler gives the command for the fast to start or end, then his command must be followed, because this is a matter of scholarly dispute but the command of the ruler dispels that dispute. 

Based on the above, you should fast and break your fast along with the people of the country where you are living, whether that is in accordance with your country of origin or not. Similarly on the day of ‘Arafah you should follow the country where you are living. 

Written by Muhammad al-Saalih al-‘Uthaymeen, 28/8/1420 AH. 

Majmoo’ al-Fataawa, 19.

Du’aa’ offered on the day of ‘Arafah.

Praise be to Allaah.

It was narrated that ‘Aa’ishah (may Allaah be pleased with her) said: The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “There is no day on which Allaah ransoms more of His slaves from the Fire than the day of ‘Arafah. He draws close then He boasts about them before the angels and says, ‘What do these people want?’” Narrated by Muslim (1348). 

It was narrated from ‘Abd-Allaah ibn ‘Amr ibn al-‘Aas (may Allaah be pleased with him) that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “The best of du’aa’ is du’aa’ on the day of ‘Arafah, and the best that I and the Prophets before me said is ‘Laa ilaaha ill-Allaah wahdahu la shareeka lah, lahu’l-mulk wa lahu’l-hamd wa huwa ‘ala kulli shay’in qadeer (There is no god but Allaah alone, with no partner or associate; His is the dominion, to Him be praise, and He has power over all things).” Narrated by al-Tirmidhi (3585)’ classed as hasan by al-Albaani in Saheeh al-Targheeb (1536). 

It was narrated from Talhah ibn ‘Ubayd ibn Kurayz in a mursal report: “The best of du’aa’ is du’aa’ on the day of ‘Arafah.” Narrated by Maalik in al-Muwatta’ (500); classed as hasan by al-Albaani in Saheeh al-Jaami’ (1102). 

The scholars differed concerning this virtue of du’aa’ on the day of ‘Arafah, whether it applies only to those who are in ‘Arafah or it includes other places. The more correct view is that it is general and that the virtue is connected to the day, but undoubtedly those who are in ‘Arafah have combined the virtue of the place with the virtue of the time. 

Al-Baaji (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: 

The words “The best of du’aa’ is on the day of ‘Arafah” mean the dhikr with the greatest blessing, the greatest reward and that which is most likely to be answered. It may be interpreted as referring to pilgrims only, because the meaning of du’aa’ on the day of ‘Arafah is very true in their case, and applies especially to them. But if the day of ‘Arafah is regarded in general terms, it is described as such because of the pilgrims being there. And Allaah knows best. End quote. 

Al-Muntaqa Sharh al-Muwatta’ (1/358). 

It is proven that some of the salaf regarded “al-ta’reef” as permissible, which means gathering in the mosques to offer du’aa’ and remember Allaah (dhikr) on the day of ‘Arafah. Among those who did that was Ibn ‘Abbaas (may Allaah be pleased with him). Imam Ahmad also regarded it as permissible although he did not do it himself. 

Ibn Qudaamah (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: 

Al-Qaadi said: There is nothing wrong with ta’reef, gathering in the afternoon of the day of ‘Arafah in the regions (i.e., other than ‘Arafah). Al-Athram said: I asked Abu ‘Abd-Allaah (i.e., Imam Ahmad) about ta’reef in the regions, where they gather in the mosques on the day of ‘Arafah, and he said: I hope that there is nothing wrong with it, as more than one did it. Al-Athram narrated that al-Hasan said: The first one who did ta’reef in Basra was Ibn ‘Abbaas (may Allaah have mercy on him). Ahmad said: The first ones who did it were Ibn ‘Abbaas and ‘Amr ibn Hurayth. 

Al-Hasan, Bakr, Thaabit and Muhammad ibn Waasi’ used to attend the mosque on the day of ‘Arafah. Ahmad said: There is nothing wrong with it, it is only du’aa’ and remembrance of Allaah (dhikr). It was said to him: Do you do it? He said: As for me, no. And it was narrated that Yahya ibn Ma’een attended (the mosque) with the people on the afternoon of ‘Arafah. End quote. 

Al-Mughni (2/129). 

This indicates that they thought that the virtue of the day of ‘Arafah did not apply only to the pilgrims only, although gathering to remember Allaah and say du’aa’ in the mosques on the day of ‘Arafah was not narrated from the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him). Hence Imam Ahmad did not do it, but he allowed it and did not forbid it, because it was narrated that some of the Sahaabah did it, such as Ibn ‘Abbaas and ‘Amr ibn Hurayth (may Allaah be pleased with them). 

And Allaah knows best.

ShareThis